|
|||||||||||
|
We presume that you do not agree with all assessments... You may put a different value on these, and there will be others who you think should be included. Use our Carbon Counting database and tell us your views. We will alter/add to these characters - when there are three suggestions for any one person. This is based completely on our own personal assessments on how these people use/d the power they have/had to reduce the carbon footprint. This is based on a mixture of media presentations, personal life styles and political initiatives. We would like to develop a methodology for assessing the carbon contribution for each organisation. So could you make suggestions where famous organisations should be in this table and explain the method you came to your conclusions... |
Who we think scores what for our personal Carbon Countender
|
|
1
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | |
| 1-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21-30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 31-40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| 51-60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|||
| 61-70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 71-80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81-90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 91-100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Practice at Work Publishing Company Ltd. |